August 31, 2007 10:17 AM
The Viability of Rural Broadband
One thing that's stuck with me from my trip to visit Hiawatha Broadband Company on Wednesday is my continuing awe over how diverse and seemingly successful this small telecom company in rural Minnesota has been.
It's odd, though: I thought rural communities were not lucrative enough to support the deployment of fiber.
I thought rural communities didn't have enough Internet-savvy customers to turn a profit.
I thought big cities and their white collar suburbs were the most viable areas to support fiber deployment.
But I'm realizing, that's just not the case.
The key factor in this equation that's often missed, it seems, is the potential for unbelievable take rates in smaller communities.
One thing that's stuck with me from my trip to visit Hiawatha Broadband Company on Wednesday is my continuing awe over how diverse and seemingly successful this small telecom company in rural Minnesota has been.
It's odd, though: I thought rural communities were not lucrative enough to support the deployment of fiber.
I thought rural communities didn't have enough Internet-savvy customers to turn a profit.
I thought big cities and their white collar suburbs were the most viable areas to support fiber deployment.
But I'm realizing, that's just not the case.
The key factor in this equation that's often missed, it seems, is the potential for unbelievable take rates in smaller communities.
For example, Hiawatha has realized take rates in excess of 70% across their networks.
Along with us on our journey was Christopher Mitchell from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, and he shared that in talking with the people from Cedar Falls, IA he learned that they've been able to realize a take rate of more than 80% in their FTTH network.
(As a point of comparison, I've heard take rates of 10-15% being cited as success stories in larger communities.)
The primary reasons cited by Gary Evans and Dan Pecorina as to how they accomplished this is simply better service at a better price, and that makes a lot of sense as these communities are often not given as much attention by larger network operators, and the lack of competition that's common in these areas does not lend itself to low rates for services. They're eager to have another choice.
Of course, it's not just that. Another thing that impressed me about Hiawatha was their emphasis on community. They make a point of setting up offices in every town they enter, and stock it with employees they hire from the community (they joked during our visit that all their customers in Wabasha, a community of 2500, have the cell phone numbers of Hiawatha's office manager and tech guy).
As we toured their headquarters they pointed out where they store Winona's Christmas lights. At their video production studio, they discussed the candidate forums they put on during the election season.
This is a company that's deeply embedded in its community. This is a company that's found success deploying and operating a fiber network in rural America.
So the next time someone tells you rural areas can't support a business wanting to deploy FTTH, let them know about Hiawatha Broadband Company.
Comments (1)
It was a great trip - and HBC is incredible. I wanted to point out that Cedar Falls is actually HFC - it was built long before FTTH was economical but they do have fiber to businesses.
Regarding a larger point, HBC has done a tremendous job blowing away the myth that smaller communities are not economical for FTTH, but public ownership has also shown that. Windom, MN - a town of 4,500 has a FTTH network with a smaller take rate - less than 50%.
Publicly financed projects do not have the pressure to turn a profit in months or a few years. They can pay it off with long term financing without breaking a sweat.
My perfect world is a company like HBC operating on publicly owned fiber.
Posted by Christopher Mitchell on August 31, 2007 3:02 PM